TID-CMM Threat-Informed Detection Capability Maturity Model
Home › Assessment › Scenarios

Step 8 — scenarios and timelines

Multi-step attacks toward a crown jewel, assessed step by step: where the chain is visible, where it fires, where it is proven, and where it breaks.

What this step establishes

A technique detection that does not contribute to narrating a full attack scenario is telemetry, not defence. This step records the scenarios you have modelled or tested — an attack tree or emulation chain to a named crown-jewel objective — and reads each one the way the Scenario Coverage Score already defines. The assessment evaluates whether the capability exists. It does not correlate live events, reconstruct incidents or predict activity.

What a scenario records

A scenario identifier and name; the objective; the crown jewel or critical service it reaches; the actor or threat hypothesis; the ordered ATT&CK techniques with a stage for each; the identities, hosts, cloud resources, applications and networks involved at each step; the expected or tested time window; for every step, its visibility, detection and validation status and its correlation keys; whether each step’s detection can be joined to the previous one, with evidence; the test date and method; the named artefacts; and the result, exceptions and investigation notes. Templates are offered from the asset types you declared on the crown-jewel step; every step in a template is meant to be edited.

Three states that are never confused

StateMeaningHow it is shown
ObservedDirectly supported by telemetry you collect.Filled marker and the word. If the technique’s required sources reach 0% of the estate the tool says so beside it, because a step cannot be observed on telemetry that does not exist.
InferredSupported by correlation and surrounding evidence.Half marker and the word. Counts toward reconstruction, never as an observed fact.
HypothesisedPossible or expected, but not observed.Empty marker and the word. A blind step in the timeline.

A predicted or inferred step is never presented as an observed fact: the timeline carries the state in a shape and a word, with colour secondary.

Detection, validation and joins

What the timeline shows

Visible and blind steps; detected and undetected steps; validated detections; broken transitions; the earliest detectable stage; steps with no correlation key; whether the chain can be reconstructed in order; and the next evidence-based improvement, chosen in a fixed order — missing telemetry first, then unassessed steps, then undetected steps, then validation, then a second detected stage, then keys and joins, then expired validations.

Covered means the existing rule, applied as written. A scenario is covered only when it is detected with evidence at two or more distinct stages and at least one of those detections is locally validated by a qualifying method. One register-validated stage plus one claimed-but-unevidenced stage is not covered; two evidenced stages with one qualifying validation is. Covered, partially evidenced, not covered and not assessed are counted; the Scenario Coverage Score is reported only when the register has at least one scenario and every scenario has an assessed step. No scenario result is averaged into the maturity score, and no second maturity score is made from them.

What it feeds

The scenario status counts in Assurance at a glance, the broken-transition count in the bottlenecks view, and the TIR-CMM export, where each registered scenario travels as an attack path (SC-n) with its stages, techniques, the asset classes of its crown jewel and a note stating its status under the rule above.

Start the assessment